<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883</id><updated>2011-07-07T16:50:34.745-07:00</updated><category term='imaginary'/><category term='reflection'/><category term='back accounts'/><category term='transactions'/><category term='first post'/><category term='photon'/><category term='identity'/><category term='politics'/><category term='light'/><category term='continuity'/><category term='freedom of speech'/><category term='mirror'/><category term='special relativity'/><category term='government'/><category term='memory'/><category term='delay'/><category term='perpetuum mobile'/><category term='past'/><category term='database'/><category term='interest'/><category term='speed of light'/><title type='text'>Physionary</title><subtitle type='html'>Ranting about lots of topics. Most include physics, math and education of those, but inconsistency tends to force me to rant about politics, climate change (I know I posted politics twice now) and energy issues (make that thrice). By the way, there will be a lot of these (but don't worry, I (usually) only nest them twice (sometimes more though)).</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>8</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-6317910109151486825</id><published>2010-05-04T08:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-04T10:17:32.835-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Invisible dust around spiral galaxies</title><summary type='text'>In a recent post at the Galaxy Zoo Blog, Bill Keel wrote about the research on the dust distribution in galaxies, as studied by the fortunate existence of overlapping galaxies. One of those was UGC 4008, with the added specialty that it's not the bright part of the galaxies overlapping, but a dark part of the spiral (the left side of the upper, small galaxy is darkened and reddened by dust from </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/6317910109151486825/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=6317910109151486825' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6317910109151486825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6317910109151486825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2010/05/invisible-dust-around-spiral-galaxies.html' title='Invisible dust around spiral galaxies'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_w5XIRrU8814/S-BKnr7supI/AAAAAAAAEIo/WBP1jSNnhOs/s72-c/UGC_4008_dust.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-5952267705706517939</id><published>2009-11-05T12:39:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T13:30:08.758-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='perpetuum mobile'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='special relativity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mirror'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='photon'/><title type='text'>Mirror, mirror, on the wall, I give you momentum, that is all!</title><summary type='text'>There's more to do with mirrors. What happens when you look at yourself, in a mirror, while you're moving?Special relativity has a lot to say on the subject. To begin with, you can't easily move faster than the speed of light, so your photons will hit the mirror earlier than you do (or fly by the mirror). That basically means that you can see yourself. Nothing strange there, yet. As you are </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/5952267705706517939/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=5952267705706517939' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/5952267705706517939'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/5952267705706517939'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2009/11/mirror-mirror-on-wall-i-give-you.html' title='Mirror, mirror, on the wall, I give you momentum, that is all!'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-2411355103984228251</id><published>2009-11-05T11:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-05T13:33:36.176-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='reflection'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='past'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mirror'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='speed of light'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='memory'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='light'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='delay'/><title type='text'>Memories from the past</title><summary type='text'>You might have seen the 2006 movie called Deja Vu. In it, the government found a way to look exactly 9/2 day back in time, and it's used to prevent some generic terrorist attack (the main character also falls in love, but this is omitted in my summary due to it being part of standard conditions for movies). Of course, controlling a wormhole for these purposes seems far-fetched at the moment, but </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/2411355103984228251/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=2411355103984228251' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/2411355103984228251'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/2411355103984228251'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2009/11/images-from-past.html' title='Memories from the past'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-460877270383843537</id><published>2009-03-18T03:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-18T04:29:59.851-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Optimal product lifetimes</title><summary type='text'>Disposable products probably are bad for the environment, because it is likely that they could be used again without much alteration. Take for example a bottle of juice: when it's empty it still is perfectly capable of containing fresh juice, although it might need some cleaning before re-use. It usually is dumped in a bin however, and at best it will go through the whole recycling machine before</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/460877270383843537/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=460877270383843537' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/460877270383843537'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/460877270383843537'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2009/03/optimal-product-lifetimes.html' title='Optimal product lifetimes'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-2410226346586443288</id><published>2009-03-05T09:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-05T13:03:26.239-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='transactions'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='back accounts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='interest'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='continuity'/><title type='text'>Continuous bank accounts</title><summary type='text'>Ever since humans started trading goods, transactions were (more or less) instantaneous events. Even today, seemingly continuous transactions, like wages and insurances, are transformed into repeating instantaneous transactions, mostly once every month or year.Even interest, which is continuous per definition, is averaged over a year and returned in one event.Doesn't this seem strange to you?Well</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/2410226346586443288/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=2410226346586443288' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/2410226346586443288'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/2410226346586443288'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2009/03/continuous-bank-accounts.html' title='Continuous bank accounts'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-6081986453011847056</id><published>2008-03-16T14:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-05T09:52:48.082-08:00</updated><title type='text'>What's next?</title><summary type='text'>Basically, all new inventions occupy only three categories:  convenience, safety and healthcare, and energy saving/efficiency gain. Actually, they all fall in the first two categories, but some new inventions don't do anything that couldn't be done before; no, those inventions just do it more efficient. And although convenience is important and safety and healthcare are definately great for </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/6081986453011847056/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=6081986453011847056' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6081986453011847056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6081986453011847056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2008/03/whats-next.html' title='What&apos;s next?'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-6352200963598439003</id><published>2007-02-20T08:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-21T11:51:26.827-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='government'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='database'/><title type='text'>Identity database [WIP]</title><summary type='text'>Hi all (and iAll, my imaginary iAudience which makes this writing useful as long as there's no real audience)!This is my first work-in-progress [WIP] post. It covers some idea which can and will be expanded in the future, for example through your comments. This time, a database in which every person is listed, including a lot of extra information.Like most of you (I assume), I sometimes wonder </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/6352200963598439003/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=6352200963598439003' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6352200963598439003'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/6352200963598439003'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2007/02/identity-database.html' title='Identity database [WIP]'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5389517160547654883.post-7023022787876663682</id><published>2007-02-17T07:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-17T10:58:00.774-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='first post'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='freedom of speech'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='imaginary'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><title type='text'>First Post</title><summary type='text'>Hello all.As this is my first post on a blog (my blog), this will probably not live up to your expectations. Which is what I would like to rant about today, because you probably don't have any expectations as there isn't any YOU yet (by now there is, because you read it now). This situation is very interesting compared to a while ago, when "politicians" (literally: people of the town) were </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/feeds/7023022787876663682/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5389517160547654883&amp;postID=7023022787876663682' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/7023022787876663682'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5389517160547654883/posts/default/7023022787876663682'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://physionary.blogspot.com/2007/02/first-post.html' title='First Post'/><author><name>Physionary</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03816336724073401388</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
